Stark and OnlyEnable solve different problems — for live site compliance, OnlyEnable is the answer. Stark is excellent at preventing accessibility issues from entering the codebase during design; OnlyEnable addresses the compliance of your existing live website. If your site is live and you need WCAG compliance, a widget for visitors, and a legal audit trail, Stark doesn't offer any of those. Use Stark in design, OnlyEnable in production.
OnlyEnable wins 7 of 10 feature categories
Feature-by-feature comparison
Every feature rated. Green check = clear winner in that category.
| Feature | OnlyEnable | Stark |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility widget for visitors | ||
| Live site WCAG scanning | ||
| Design-phase accessibility (Figma etc.) | ||
| Color contrast checker | Basic | Best-in-class |
| Manual WCAG audit of live site | Included ($99/mo+) | |
| Source-code fix delivery | ||
| Ongoing production monitoring | ||
| Documented compliance trail | ||
| Starting price | $29/mo (live site) | Free–$45/mo (design tool) |
| Free initial audit | Free tier (design only) |
Why teams switch to OnlyEnable from Stark
Where Stark falls short
Honest drawbacks to know before you sign up.
- Designer-first accessibility tool — integrates directly into Figma, Sketch, XD, and browser dev tools
- Best-in-class color contrast checker and vision simulation tools for design teams
- Excellent UX — makes accessibility approachable for non-specialists in product design workflows
When Stark might still make sense
Stark is the right tool for product designers and design systems teams who want to build accessibility into their workflow from the start, catching issues in Figma before a single line of code is written.
For everyone else — which is the vast majority of businesses — OnlyEnable is the better choice.
Pricing — we cost less, include more
- Manual WCAG audits included
- Source-code fix recommendations
- Monthly billing, cancel anytime
- Free initial audit
- Audits sold separately
- No source-code fixes
- No free initial audit